Life of a happy slave vs. life of a pioneer

 

Life of a happy slave vs. life of a pioneer

 

 

If a slave admits that he/she is a slave, he/she can live happy life.

 

But the happiness can be overturned by the owner.

 

If you think that you are happy because of someone other than yourself, you are mentally enslaved.

 

In other words, you are not the owner of your own life.

 

==============

 

Pioneers can also feel happiness when they achieved their goals.

This happiness is different because it is from his/her own achievement.

 

They will leave the happiness behind to enterprise into darkness again.

 

==============

 

The reason for studying is to live a fulfilling life as a master. Not a slave.

 

If you are happy at the moment, exam where the happiness is from.

 

 

- PonderEd, all about study methods to be a master! -

 

- http://PonderEd.ca -

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The difference between learning and studying

  The difference between learning and studying ﾠ Learning is possible only if there is something to learn (knowledge that already exist). Learning is possible only if there is someone who can teach you. Learning is possible only if someone has found something new or created new knowledge. ﾠ The people who focus on learning are: ﾠ 1. Moving towards a passive life. 2. You wouldn't know what to do unless you learned what to do by reading a book or being taught. 3. You would be frustrated if you don't have an answer unless someone gives you the answer. ﾠ Because of these, if you enjoy learning new things or knowledge, you might enjoy the learning but you will be mentally enslaved by the people with more knowledge or (and) political or (and) economic power gradually.   ﾠ ============================ Studying is a process of discovering new things or finding answers oneself. When you encounter something that you didn't know (or didn't expect), you can find answers by studying
Read more

Students shouldn’t plagiarize, really?

  Students shouldn’t plagiarize, really?   Educators say that they teach students to be leaders. Educators claim that students have to learn to critical and creative thinking to be leaders. For these, educators ask students not to copy and paste because it is not creative. They also say that plagiarism is serious issues.   Yet, educators use publisher-prepared or other exam banks to prepare exams and quizzes.   Instead of creating their own exams and quizzes, they copy and paste from other sources including textbooks. Since institutes pay for the services and textbooks, it might not be a crime.   But it is still copy-paste.   Could educators who are not able to create their own exams and quizzes teach students to be leaders? The chances would be very close to ‘NONE’. Still, they claim that they teach students to be leaders. f you are a student and see an educator uses exams and quizzes that can be found online or other sources, you should request them ‘N
Read more