Everything about brain and education

 

The reason to study Theﾠreason to study is to become a leader. A leaderﾠis a person who leads a community or a country. Inﾠother words, the reason to study is to become a king, queen, or president. Thisﾠis what all educational institutes claim. Butﾠuniversities teach students knowledge and skills for jobs. Studentsﾠalso wants those education so that they can get a job after school. A company and a societyﾠwelcome these educations because this supplies labor easy. Becauseﾠthere are many students with similar knowledge and skills, they can select whoever they want. Inﾠaddition, companies can replace old employee with new and fresh ones. Thisﾠis like replacing old parts in a machine with new one.   Basically,ﾠeducation focusing on knowledge and skills for jobs is turning students become a small part in a machine which can be replaced anytime. Ifﾠyou want to be a leader, you need to say goodbye to these educations. Beingﾠtrained to be a small part does not provide quality to become a leade

  The reality of university education that focus on knowledge and skills for jobs     Companies need university graduates with knowledge and skills that they need.  Why?   In most cases, a company wants someone who is ready to work with minimum training.  This is most efficient way of running a company in terms of money and time.   But what does this mean for students?    It means the student can be replaced by anyone who has similar knowledge and training. This also means that anyone can be replaced anytime.  In addition, by forcing students to compete for the same knowledge and skills, societies can filter more suitable ones for them.   Basically, university graduates are being manipulated to be small parts like nuts and bolts in a big machine. Whenever needed or newer version comes out, the old one can be thrown out.   And universities are the pipeline to provide these parts for the companies.   Ironically, students line up to get into a university. They pay high tuition to be cut a

  Students shouldn’t plagiarize, really?   Educators say that they teach students to be leaders. Educators claim that students have to learn to critical and creative thinking to be leaders. For these, educators ask students not to copy and paste because it is not creative. They also say that plagiarism is serious issues.   Yet, educators use publisher-prepared or other exam banks to prepare exams and quizzes.   Instead of creating their own exams and quizzes, they copy and paste from other sources including textbooks. Since institutes pay for the services and textbooks, it might not be a crime.   But it is still copy-paste.   Could educators who are not able to create their own exams and quizzes teach students to be leaders? The chances would be very close to ‘NONE’. Still, they claim that they teach students to be leaders. f you are a student and see an educator uses exams and quizzes that can be found online or other sources, you should request them ‘N